By Cristina Andersson
To avoid all (male) suspicion that I would be just
another woman saying that “women must be given equal opportunities for
leading positions”, I want to begin this article by saying that on gender
equality Sweden and Finland are the top two countries in the entire world. It
does not mean that the work is over but it means that here in Scandinavia we
have the opportunities to enter any leading position in any field of business,
politics, social services etc.
No matter the gender, the actual way of leadership can
be male or female. To my experience many women adapt male behavioural patterns
when climbing up the organizational ladder.
One of the many topics in the Globeforum
in Stockholm was the question of Female Leadership in the Emerging Markets. In
the roundtable seminars the topic was widely discussed with Nordic women as
facilitators. One of my comments was “What do we Finnish and Swedish women
really have to give to the women in the emerging markets when we are quite
accustomed to holding leading positions and when many of us have become ‘one of
the guys’ abandoning our natural female way of making things click. How can we
help if we have been alienated from the problem?”
Law of attraction is a very popular term nowadays when
the movie “The Secret” is conquering the world with it’s
message of hope and positive thinking. Attraction is, to my understanding, the
female force. Women are not by nature used to push things forward but to use
different means to attract things to happen. For example, when we communicate
we don’t go straight forward saying: “I want a cup of coffee” but rather “Oh,
how tired I am, I could really use a cup of coffee” or “what a nice coffee shop
that is….”. In order to achieve higher positions in
the organization women are taught to become more straightforward in their
communication, they are taught to say “bring me a cup of coffee, please”. This is of course time saving and efficient
but the price is that the woman loses her natural female attractiveness and
gains the attraction of power instead, and eventually becomes one of the guys.
Law of gravity might be used as a metaphor for male
leadership. Men tend to send things forward with such kick and force that the
one selected target is reached without deviations and attuning operations. The
people around are seen more as pawns that can be ordered and moved in the “name
of the task” than individuals that could be attracted to participate an
inspirational challenge. Offering a big sum of money and bonuses is a male way
to gain commitment while offering initial participation, inspiration, growth
and learning is a female way to gain commitment – money must be self-evident.
Unfortunately, when the number of
female leaders increase in the companies the systems are not developed
to support, empower and promote female leadership. The systems remain “male”
and women have learned that true appreciation and acceptance comes from reconciling
ones self into the “male” system. Therefore the real change for female values,
we might call those values here as “soft human values”, do not take place in
the companies. I worked as a business consultant for a decade and saw many
‘womanly women’ give up their womanliness and become one of the guys, for the
sake of survival and success in the company. The question is: “does this kind
of mental castration bring true happiness and fullness of life and does it
really create better workplaces and more successful companies?”
One more question: “If we are to learn tolerance and
true appreciation of diversity, are we really doing it by making everybody fit
the system? Are we really incapable of creating systems that allow people be themselves and give their best talent, true
self-expression and natural creative force to serve the common good?”
Cristina%20Andersson_files/image005.jpg)